Steel and aluminum tariffs remain at 50% under Section 232, while copper's rate was cut from 50% to 25% for some products in April 2026, even as the program keeps expanding into new sectors.
At a glance
- Steel and aluminum both carry a 50% Section 232 tariff on commodity-grade metal (25% on finished goods), having doubled from an initial 25% rate set in February 2025 to 50% in June 2025.
- Copper is the exception: semi-finished products and certain derivatives were tariffed at 50% from August 1, 2025, then cut to 25% for some derivative categories in April 2026, while refined copper itself remains untariffed.
- Mexico is the largest single supplier of the copper derivatives the US imports (22%) and supplies roughly 29% of both steel and aluminum derivative imports; Canada supplies about a third of aluminum derivative imports, down from roughly half pre-tariff.
- China's direct exposure on steel, aluminum and copper is comparatively small (16-18%), but it supplies nearly 70% of US rare-earth imports and 90% of global gallium production -- both under active Section 232 investigation, not yet tariffed.
What happened
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) published a comprehensive mapped guide on September 17, 2026 to every active and pending use of Section 232, the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 provision that lets a US president impose tariffs once the Commerce Department finds an import poses a threat to national security. Nineteen months after the first steel and aluminum duties took effect in February 2025 at 25%, the rate has since doubled: commodity-grade steel and aluminum now carry a 50% tariff, with a lower 25% rate on finished goods, and a separate schedule for allies -- 25% on UK steel with a 15% rate on UK derivative products, 15% on industrial equipment from select allies, and 10% on products with US-sourced content.
Copper tells a different story. Semi-finished copper products and certain copper derivatives were first tariffed at 50% starting August 1, 2025, but the administration cut that rate to 25% for some derivative categories in April 2026 -- the same month it also adjusted the steel and aluminum carve-outs. Refined copper itself, the form US industry consumes directly for wiring and construction, has never been tariffed at all; US-smelted or cast copper products carry a separate 10% rate. Copper is so far the only one of the program's three founding metals to see its rate cut rather than held or raised.
CFR's maps also show how unevenly the tariff burden falls by country. Mexico supplies 22% of the copper derivative imports the US brings in, the largest single source, and also accounts for roughly 29% of both steel and aluminum derivative imports. Canada supplies just over 21% of steel derivative imports and about a third of aluminum derivative imports, down from roughly half before the tariffs took hold. China's exposure on these three metals is comparatively modest -- 16% to 18% of steel and aluminum derivatives, 17% of copper -- but the guide flags a bigger dependency still unresolved: nearly 70% of US rare-earth imports and 90% of global gallium production trace back to China, both the subject of an open Section 232 investigation rather than a finalized tariff.
The details
Section 232 works differently from an ordinary trade dispute. Rather than responding to a specific unfair-trade complaint, it lets the president act on a Commerce Department finding that an import threatens national security, which is why the same 1962 law now covers products as far apart as steel beams and thermal-imaging drones. That legal design also explains why the program can move fast in either direction: because no negotiated agreement underpins any individual tariff, a rate can be doubled, as steel and aluminum's was between June 2025 and April 2026, or cut, as copper's derivative rate was in that same April round, purely on the administration's own reassessment.
Copper's rate cut is the clearest evidence of that flexibility being used to relieve pressure rather than just applied for protection. Refined copper -- the form of the metal US wiring, construction and electronics manufacturers actually consume -- was left untariffed from the start, while the 50% rate fell only on semi-finished and derivative products, the categories where the US has more domestic fabrication capacity to protect. Cutting the derivative rate to 25% in April 2026 suggests that even that narrower tariff was pushing costs onto downstream buyers faster than the administration wanted, in a market where copper had already been trading near record highs for reasons largely unrelated to the tariff itself.
The country exposure data explains why steel and aluminum tariffs land so differently depending on the supplier. Canada and Mexico's shares are high mainly because decades of integrated North American manufacturing built deep cross-border supply chains for semi-finished metal -- the same reason Canada's aluminum exposure, even after falling from roughly half of US imports to about a third, remains the largest of any single country. China's low direct share on these three metals is not really a sign of light exposure to the broader program; it reflects that Washington's concern with China on materials runs through a different channel entirely -- the concentrated supply of rare earths and gallium that China controls almost outright, which is still sitting in an open investigation rather than a finished tariff.
The direction of travel matters most for the metals CFR did not include in the original three. Drones went from nothing to a 100% tariff on large units within months in August 2026, and polysilicon -- the raw material behind solar panels -- is due to join the list at 15% in December 2026. Both moves show a program still actively expanding its scope even as it fine-tunes rates on the metals it started with, which leaves the still-open critical-minerals investigation as the single biggest unresolved question for anyone pricing US metal and materials costs into 2027.
Why it matters
None of the countries CFR identifies as most exposed to steel, aluminum or copper tariffs is India -- Canada, Mexico and China dominate that list -- but Indian buyers still feel the program indirectly. Tariffs that lift US domestic steel, aluminum and copper premiums pull import demand and pricing pressure toward whichever markets remain open, a dynamic that has already shown up in this site's coverage of copper's run to record LME prices amid US-bound stockpiling. Worth separating clearly from Section 232: the 100% tariff threat India itself faces over Russian oil purchases runs through a different legal authority tied to sanctions, not this national-security metals program, so the two shouldn't be read as the same policy track even though both are Trump-era tariff tools moving at the same time.
Our read
Outlook: bullish. Steel and aluminum tariffs holding at 50% since June 2025, with copper's derivative rate still at 25% after April 2026's cut, continue to support elevated US domestic metal premiums relative to global benchmarks -- a genuinely bullish setup for US producer pricing. Confidence sits in the high 50s rather than higher because copper's rate cut is direct evidence the administration will ease a tariff once downstream cost pressure becomes visible, and several larger pending investigations (critical minerals chief among them) could move pricing sharply in either direction once resolved.
What to watch
- The outcome of the still-open Section 232 critical-minerals investigation, given China's roughly 70% share of US rare-earth imports and 90% share of global gallium production.
- Whether the December 2026 polysilicon tariff takes effect at the scheduled 15% rate or is adjusted beforehand, following copper's precedent for post-announcement changes.
- Any further extension of copper's partial rate cut (50% to 25%) to additional derivative categories, or to steel and aluminum.
- Progress on the semiconductor, commercial aircraft, wind turbine, medical equipment, industrial robot and anthracite coal investigations, none of which carried a finalized tariff as of CFR's September 2026 mapping.
For information only, not investment advice.
Copper price in India
metalscost.com India reference price as of 2026-10-14.
Detailed analysis
Timeline
- 2025-02-01: The Trump administration imposes its first Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, an initial 25% rate on commodity-grade metal.
- 2025-06-01: The steel and aluminum tariff rate is doubled to 50% on commodity-grade metal, with a 25% rate on finished goods.
- 2025-08-01: A 50% Section 232 tariff on semi-finished copper products and certain copper derivatives takes effect; refined copper itself is left untariffed.
- 2026-01-01: A Section 232 semiconductors investigation results in a 25% tariff on a narrow re-export category, with further negotiations directed rather than a broader tariff imposed immediately.
- 2026-04-01: The administration adjusts steel and aluminum carve-outs for allies and cuts the copper derivative tariff from 50% to 25% for some product categories.
- 2026-07-01: A Section 232 investigation into commercial aircraft and jet engines concludes with negotiations ordered but no tariff imposed.
- 2026-08-01: New Section 232 tariffs are announced on drones (100% on large drones and thermal-imaging equipment, 25% on smaller drones and parts) and, under the related Section 338 authority, a 50% tariff on Canadian furniture and wood products.
- 2026-09-17: The Council on Foreign Relations publishes its comprehensive mapped guide to every active and pending Section 232 tariff action.
- 2026-12-01: A 15% Section 232 tariff on polysilicon, solar ingots, wafers, cells and modules is scheduled to take effect.
Supply Drivers
US import dependency varies sharply by metal and supplier under Section 232's mapping: Mexico supplies 22% of copper derivative imports and about 29% of both steel and aluminum derivative imports, while Canada supplies roughly a third of aluminum derivative imports, down from about half before the tariffs -- concentrations that shape how exposed US downstream buyers are to any further rate change.
Government Policies
Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 lets the US president impose tariffs once a Commerce Department investigation finds an import threatens national security, the legal mechanism behind the steel, aluminum and copper tariffs; the same authority now covers eleven finalized tariff categories and seven more still under investigation, per CFR's September 17, 2026 mapping.
Trade Tariffs
Steel and aluminum carry a 50% Section 232 tariff on commodity-grade metal (25% on finished goods), unchanged since being doubled in June 2025 and only adjusted at the margins (UK, allied and US-content carve-outs) in April 2026. Copper's semi-finished and derivative tariff was cut from 50% to 25% for some product categories in the same April 2026 round, while refined copper stays untariffed.
Geopolitical Risks
China supplies nearly 70% of US rare-earth imports and 90% of global gallium production, concentrations CFR flags as the subject of an open Section 232 critical-minerals investigation that remained unresolved as of the guide's September 2026 publication -- a far larger potential exposure than China's comparatively modest 16-18% share of steel and aluminum derivative imports.
What could lift prices
- Steel and aluminum tariffs have held at 50% since June 2025 with only marginal carve-out adjustments, sustaining elevated protected pricing for US domestic producers of both metals.
- The program keeps expanding rather than retreating -- drones joined the list at up to 100% in August 2026, and polysilicon is scheduled to join at 15% in December 2026, signalling continued administration commitment to the tariff wall.
- Refined copper's continued exemption from tariffs, alongside a still-elevated 25% derivative rate, preserves a protected pricing floor for US copper fabricators without fully cutting off the refined supply US industry needs.
What could weigh on prices
- Copper's derivative tariff was cut from 50% to 25% in April 2026, the program's only rate reduction on a founding metal so far, showing the administration will ease a tariff once downstream cost pressure becomes visible.
- Several major investigations -- critical minerals, semiconductors, commercial aircraft -- remain open without a finalized tariff, leaving prolonged uncertainty that can delay investment decisions tied to those inputs.
- The commercial aircraft investigation concluded in July 2026 with negotiations ordered but no tariff imposed at all, a precedent that a similar critical-minerals outcome could also end without new duties.
Country impact
| Country | Impact | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| United States | High | The US is the tariff-setting country under Section 232, protecting domestic steel, aluminum and copper producers with rates as high as 50% while raising input costs for downstream manufacturers reliant on imported semi-finished metal. |
| Mexico | High | Mexico is the largest single supplier of the copper derivative imports the US brings in and a major supplier of steel and aluminum derivatives, making it the country most exposed to any further Section 232 rate change across all three founding metals. |
| Canada | High | Canada's aluminum exposure remains the largest of any single country even after falling sharply since the tariffs took effect, reflecting how deeply integrated North American aluminum supply chains were before 2025. |
| China | Medium | China's direct exposure to the steel, aluminum and copper tariffs is comparatively modest, but it sits at the center of the far larger unresolved risk in the still-open critical-minerals and rare-earth investigation. |
Industry impact
| Industry | Effect | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Construction | Negative | Construction firms buying imported semi-finished steel and aluminum face a sustained 50% tariff wall on commodity-grade metal, raising input costs for a sector that consumes both metals at scale. |
| Automotive Manufacturing | Negative | Autos, auto parts, trucks and buses all carry their own Section 232 tariffs (25% on imported cars/engines/parts, 25% on medium/heavy trucks), stacking on top of steel and aluminum input costs for vehicle makers sourcing components from Mexico, Canada or China. |
Who gains, who loses
- US domestic steel and aluminum producers: A sustained 50% tariff on commodity-grade imports protects domestic producers' pricing power against Canadian, Mexican and Chinese competition, a rate that has held steady since June 2025.
- US copper fabricators: A 25% derivative tariff still shields domestic fabrication from the cheapest imported semi-finished copper, even after April 2026's rate cut, while refined copper stays available untariffed for their own input needs.
- US construction and auto manufacturers reliant on imported metal: Firms importing semi-finished steel, aluminum or copper derivatives from Mexico, Canada or China absorb a 25-50% tariff wall on top of already-elevated global metal prices, raising input costs across two of the tariff program's most metal-intensive downstream industries.
Other ways this could play out
- If the still-open critical-minerals investigation concludes with a finalized tariff, it could sharply raise costs across magnet, battery and electronics supply chains that depend on China's roughly 70% share of US rare-earth imports and 90% share of global gallium production.
- If that investigation instead follows the commercial aircraft precedent -- negotiations ordered but no tariff -- critical minerals could avoid a Section 232 duty entirely despite the concentration risk CFR's mapping highlights.
- If copper's April 2026 rate cut extends to more derivative categories or to steel and aluminum, downstream manufacturing costs tied to those metals could ease further into 2027; if the administration instead reverses course, rates could climb back toward their original levels.
Price risks
- A finalized tariff on critical minerals and rare earths, given China's near-total concentration in both, could raise costs sharply across multiple metal-dependent supply chains at once.
- Further expansion of the program into new sectors -- as seen with drones and the upcoming polysilicon tariff -- could broaden cost pressure beyond the three founding metals.
- A reversal of copper's April 2026 rate cut, or a similar future cut to steel and aluminum, would move already-elevated US domestic metal premiums in opposite directions depending on which way the administration turns next.
Historical comparison
- 2018 Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs: Trump's first-term Section 232 action set steel tariffs at 25% and aluminum at 10% -- both metals now carry a 50% rate on commodity-grade product under the 2025-2026 program, roughly double the 2018 steel rate and five times the original aluminum rate.
Technical view
Price is trading above both its 20-period and 50-period moving averages, a bullish alignment.
Computed from metalscost.com's own stored price history.
United States
Mexico
Canada
China